Approaches to Selecting an Appropriate Motor Size

Approaches to Selecting an Appropriate Motor Size

Common Risks of Improper Door Use

Choosing the right motor size for a garage door is a decision that requires careful consideration of various factors, most importantly the weight and dimensions of the door itself. High-torque motors are suitable for heavy garage doors emergency garage door repair near me carriage house. This process is vital to ensure smooth operation, longevity of the motor, and safety.


Firstly, understanding the weight of your garage door is paramount. Garage doors can be made from a variety of materials including steel, wood, aluminum, and fiberglass. Each material varies significantly in weight; for instance, wooden doors tend to be heavier than their aluminum counterparts. The heavier the door, the more powerful a motor you will need to lift it efficiently. A typical single-car garage door usually weighs between 130 to 350 pounds while double-car doors can range from 200 to 500 pounds or more.


The dimensions or size of the garage door also play a crucial role in selecting an appropriate motor size. Standard sizes include single-car doors at approximately 8 to 9 feet wide by 7 feet tall and double-car doors at about 16 feet wide by 7 feet tall. Larger or custom-sized doors may require motors with greater horsepower (HP) due to increased force needed for opening and closing.


Motor power for garage doors commonly comes in three main sizes: 1/3 HP, 1/2 HP, and 3/4 HP or higher. A 1/3 HP motor might suffice for lighter single-car garage doors made from lightweight materials like aluminum or fiberglass. Conversely, heavier wooden or insulated steel double-car doors typically necessitate at least a 1/2 HP motor to manage their substantial weight efficiently.


Beyond just weight and dimensions, other considerations may affect your choice. For instance, if your garage is attached to living spaces such as bedrooms or offices where noise could be disruptive, opting for a quieter belt-drive opener rather than chain-driven models might be beneficial despite requiring similar horsepower.


Additionally, frequent usage patterns should be contemplated when choosing an appropriate motor size; garages used several times daily would benefit from more durable motors with higher horsepower ratings designed specifically for heavy-duty use.


In conclusion, selecting an appropriate motor size hinges on accurately assessing both the weight and dimensions of your specific garage door alongside considering any additional preferences like operational noise level or expected frequency of use. With these factors duly evaluated against available options on today's market ranging across different power levels tailored towards varying needs - homeowners can make informed choices ensuring optimal performance matched perfectly with their unique circumstances thus securing reliability paired seamlessly alongside functionality within everyday life experiences surrounding our beloved garages!

Evaluating different types of motors available in the market is a critical task, especially when considering the topic of approaches to selecting an appropriate motor size. The choice of motor type and size can significantly impact the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and overall performance of any application, whether it be industrial machinery, household appliances, or electric vehicles.


In today's market, there are several types of motors available, each with its unique characteristics and advantages. The most common types include AC (Alternating Current) motors, DC (Direct Current) motors, servo motors, and stepper motors. Each type serves specific applications more effectively than others due to their inherent design features.


AC motors are widely used for their robustness and simplicity. They tend to be less expensive and easier to maintain compared to other types. Within this category, induction motors are prevalent because they do not require brushes or commutators. However, selecting the right size is essential as an undersized motor can lead to overheating while an oversized motor could result in unnecessary energy consumption.


DC motors offer precise control over speed and torque which makes them suitable for applications requiring variable speed control. They come in brushed and brushless designs; brushless DC motors are known for their high efficiency and longevity due to reduced mechanical wear. The sizing must take into account the required torque at various speeds since these factors influence operational efficiency.


Servo motors are excellent for applications requiring high precision positioning such as robotics or CNC machinery due to their feedback control systems. When evaluating servo motors for size appropriateness, one must consider the load inertia and required acceleration rates since these parameters directly affect performance outcomes.


Stepper motors excel in applications where open-loop control is needed without feedback mechanisms such as 3D printers or certain automation tasks. They move in discrete steps which allow for accurate positioning; however, they can lose steps under excessive loads if improperly sized.


Choosing the correct motor size involves assessing both technical specifications and application requirements such as load capacity, speed range, duty cycle, environmental conditions like temperature or humidity levels among other factors. Engineers often use tools like performance curves provided by manufacturers that map out torque versus speed characteristics across different operating ranges.


Additionally, advancements in technology have led to intelligent motor systems equipped with sensors that provide real-time data on performance metrics enabling predictive maintenance strategies thereby extending equipment life cycles further emphasizing correct sizing decisions initially made at purchase time.


Ultimately though no single approach fits all scenarios given varying demands across industries hence careful analysis based upon detailed understanding combining theoretical knowledge alongside practical insights derived from past experiences remains indispensable when deciding upon ideal motor solutions tailored specifically towards meeting organizational goals efficiently amidst dynamic marketplace landscapes today!

Our Podcast:

Social Media About us:

How to reach us:


How power surges can affect garage door opener functionality

Power surges, often caused by lightning strikes, electrical grid malfunctions, or sudden restoration of power after an outage, can have a significant impact on various household appliances and electronic devices.. One such vulnerable piece of equipment is the garage door opener.

How power surges can affect garage door opener functionality

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Importance of Professional Installation and Maintenance

When selecting an appropriate motor size for a door, one must carefully assess the power requirements based on door usage and frequency. This process is crucial to ensure not only the optimal performance of the door system but also its longevity and energy efficiency. The task involves understanding several key factors that influence motor sizing, each of which plays a pivotal role in determining the most suitable motor for any given application.


Firstly, it is essential to consider the physical characteristics of the door itself, such as its weight and dimensions. Heavier doors naturally require more power to operate smoothly, while larger doors may need motors with higher torque capabilities to handle their extensive movement range. Therefore, accurately measuring these attributes provides a foundational understanding of the base power requirements.


Beyond physical aspects, one must also evaluate how often and under what conditions the door will be used. Doors that are frequently opened and closed throughout the day demand motors that can withstand high cycles of operation without overheating or experiencing undue wear. For instance, an automatic sliding door at an airport terminal might undergo thousands of operations daily, necessitating a robust motor capable of continuous duty cycles.


Another critical factor is the speed at which the door needs to open and close. Certain environments require rapid access; for example, emergency exits or industrial settings where time efficiency is paramount might need faster operational speeds. Motors designed for quick response times typically consume more power but provide essential functionality in specific contexts.


Environmental conditions also impact motor selection. In outdoor applications where doors face varying weather conditions-extreme temperatures, humidity levels, or exposure to dust-motors with specific protective features or ratings (like IP ratings) might be necessary to ensure reliability and durability over time.


Additionally, energy efficiency should not be overlooked when assessing power requirements. With growing emphasis on sustainability and cost savings, choosing a motor size that meets operational needs without excessive energy consumption can lead to significant long-term benefits both financially and environmentally.


In conclusion, selecting an appropriate motor size requires a comprehensive assessment of multiple factors related to door usage and frequency. By understanding physical characteristics, operational demands, environmental influences, and energy considerations, one can make informed decisions that balance performance with efficiency-a crucial approach in optimizing automated systems across various applications.

Importance of Professional Installation and Maintenance

Warning Signs of Malfunctioning Garage Doors

When selecting an appropriate motor size for any application, there are a multitude of factors to consider, but energy efficiency and cost implications stand at the forefront of this decision-making process. The balance between these two critical aspects can significantly impact both the operational efficiency and economic viability of a project.


Energy efficiency is a paramount consideration as it directly influences the operational costs over the life cycle of the motor. A properly sized motor operates more efficiently by reducing unnecessary energy consumption, leading to lower electricity bills and reduced environmental impact. Oversized motors often run below their optimal load range, resulting in wasted energy and increased wear and tear due to cycling inefficiencies. Conversely, undersized motors may struggle to meet demand, leading to overheating and premature failure. Thus, selecting a motor size that aligns closely with the operational demands ensures that energy is utilized effectively.


Cost implications extend beyond just the initial purchase price of the motor. While larger motors might seem attractive due to their potential for handling future capacity increases or unforeseen loads, they come with higher upfront costs and increased energy expenses if not used optimally. Therefore, it's crucial to evaluate the total cost of ownership rather than just initial investment when considering motor size. This includes maintenance costs, downtime risks associated with inappropriate sizing, and potential penalties for inefficient energy use.


Moreover, advancements in technology have introduced high-efficiency motors that can offer significant savings over time despite higher initial costs. These models often provide a quick return on investment through better performance metrics and lower operational expenses. Additionally, incorporating variable frequency drives (VFDs) can enhance flexibility by allowing operators to adjust motor speed according to load requirements, further optimizing energy usage.


Therefore, when approaching the task of selecting an appropriate motor size, it is vital to conduct a comprehensive analysis that considers current demands as well as future needs while keeping an eye on both energy efficiency and cost ramifications. Engaging with engineers who specialize in motor applications can provide valuable insights into achieving this balance effectively.


In conclusion, choosing the right motor size involves more than just matching physical dimensions or power ratings; it requires a holistic view that prioritizes long-term sustainability through efficient energy use while being mindful of financial constraints. By carefully considering these elements during selection processes, industries can ensure they are making informed decisions that benefit both their bottom line and environmental footprint.

Safety Tips for Homeowners Using Garage Doors

When it comes to selecting an appropriate motor size, the decision-making process often involves a myriad of considerations. Among these, factoring in installation space and compatibility with existing systems stands as a critical component. This approach ensures not only the operational efficiency of the motor but also its seamless integration into the broader framework of machinery or equipment.


Installation space is often one of the first physical constraints encountered during motor selection. The available space determines not just the size but also the type of motor that can be installed. In environments where space is at a premium, such as in high-density manufacturing facilities or compact consumer products, engineers must carefully evaluate the spatial requirements and potential configurations. Selecting a motor that fits within these constraints without compromising on performance demands a thorough understanding of both dimensional limitations and potential mechanical interactions within the system.


Moreover, installation space affects more than just the physical footprint of a motor; it influences heat dissipation and accessibility for maintenance. A motor crammed into an inadequately ventilated area might suffer from overheating issues, leading to premature failure or reduced efficiency. Therefore, adequate spacing for airflow and maintenance access becomes crucial in ensuring long-term reliability and ease of serviceability.


Compatibility with existing systems is another pivotal consideration when selecting a motor size. Modern industrial landscapes are characterized by intricate networks of interconnected machinery, where each component must harmonize with others to achieve optimal performance. A newly installed motor must therefore align with predefined specifications-such as torque requirements and speed ratings-of adjacent components to prevent bottlenecks or mechanical mismatches that could hinder overall system efficacy.


Beyond mechanical compatibility, electrical compatibility plays an equally significant role. The selected motor must match the power supply capabilities and control systems already in place to avoid unforeseen disruptions or costly upgrades. This requires a comprehensive analysis of voltage levels, current ratings, and control interfaces to ensure that integration does not necessitate extensive modifications.


Furthermore, technological advancements have introduced motors with smart capabilities that interface seamlessly with digital control systems. Incorporating these smart motors can enhance compatibility by offering advanced diagnostics and communication features that integrate well with existing automated processes.


In conclusion, when approaching the task of selecting an appropriate motor size, factoring in installation space and compatibility with existing systems is indispensable. These considerations ensure that the chosen motor not only fulfills its intended function efficiently but also harmonizes within its operational environment without necessitating significant alterations or adaptations. By prioritizing these factors during selection, engineers can achieve a harmonious balance between physical constraints and functional demands-a vital step toward achieving sustainable operational excellence in any application setting.

When selecting an appropriate motor size for any application, ensuring safety features and compliance with industry standards is of paramount importance. This crucial process not only ensures the reliable and efficient operation of machinery but also protects both operators and equipment from potential hazards. Safety considerations intertwine closely with technical specifications, making it essential to understand how these elements contribute to the overall decision-making process.


Firstly, understanding the application's specific requirements forms the foundation of selecting a suitable motor size. This involves evaluating factors such as load characteristics, operational environment, and duty cycle. Each of these variables influences the motor's performance and its ability to safely handle the demands placed upon it. Overloading a motor by choosing an undersized unit can lead to overheating, reduced lifespan, and even catastrophic failure-posing significant safety risks. Conversely, opting for an oversized motor may result in inefficient energy usage and increased operational costs.


Compliance with industry standards is another critical component in this selection process. Standards set forth by organizations such as the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) or the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) provide guidelines that ensure motors meet minimum safety and performance criteria. These standards cover various aspects such as insulation levels, temperature ratings, enclosure types, and efficiency classes. By adhering to these established norms, manufacturers ensure their motors are designed to operate safely under specified conditions.


Additionally, reviewing safety features inherent to motor design is indispensable for safeguarding operations. Modern motors often incorporate protective mechanisms like thermal overload protection and short-circuit prevention systems. Thermal protection prevents damage from excessive heat buildup by automatically shutting down or reducing power when temperatures exceed safe limits. Meanwhile, short-circuit prevention systems protect against electrical faults that could otherwise cause fires or damage connected equipment.


Moreover, integrating advanced monitoring technologies can enhance safety further by providing real-time data on motor performance and condition. Sensors that track parameters such as vibration levels or bearing temperatures enable predictive maintenance strategies that preemptively address issues before they escalate into failures.


In conclusion, selecting an appropriate motor size requires careful consideration of both technical specifications and safety measures in line with industry standards. By thoroughly assessing application requirements and leveraging established guidelines alongside modern protective technologies, engineers can make informed decisions that optimize both performance and safety outcomes. Such diligence not only maximizes operational efficiency but also ensures a secure working environment-underscoring the vital role that proper motor selection plays in industrial applications today.

 

A remote control for a keyless entry system built into an ignition key: pressing a button on the key unlocks the car doors, while another button locks the car and activates its alarm system

A remote keyless system (RKS), also known as remote keyless entry (RKE) or remote central locking, is an electronic lock that controls access to a building or vehicle by using an electronic remote control (activated by a handheld device or automatically by proximity).[1] RKS largely and quickly superseded keyless entry, a budding technology that restrictively bound locking and unlocking functions to vehicle-mounted keypads.

Widely used in automobiles, an RKS performs the functions of a standard car key without physical contact. When within a few yards of the car, pressing a button on the remote can lock or unlock the doors, and may perform other functions.

A remote keyless system can include both remote keyless entry (RKE), which unlocks the doors, and remote keyless ignition (RKI), which starts the engine.

History

[edit]

Remote keyless entry was patented in 1981 by Paul Lipschutz, who worked for Nieman (a supplier of security components to the car industry) and had developed a number of automotive security devices. His electrically actuated lock system could be controlled by using a handheld fob to stream infrared data. Patented in 1981 after successful submission in 1979, it worked using a "coded pulse signal generator and battery-powered infra-red radiation emitter." In some geographic areas, the system is called a PLIP system, or Plipper, after Lipschutz. Infrared technology was superseded in 1995 when a European frequency was standardised.[2][3]

The remote keyless systems using a handheld transmitter first appeared on the French made Renault Fuego in 1982,[4] and as an option on several American Motors vehicles in 1983, including the Renault Alliance. The feature gained its first widespread availability in the U.S. on several General Motors vehicles in 1989.[citation needed]

Prior to Remote Keyless Entry, a number of systems were introduced featuring Keyless Entry (i.e., not remote), including Ford's 1980 system introduced on the Ford Thunderbird, Mercury Cougar, Lincoln Continental Mark VI, and Lincoln Town Car, which Ford called Keyless Entry System (later marketed SecuriCode). The system used a five-button keypad on the driver-side with that could unlock the driver's door when the code was entered, with subsequent code entries to unlock all doors or trunk — or lock the vehicle from the outside.

The sixth generation Buick Electra (1985-1991) featured a sill-mounted keypad for model years 1985-1988, superseded in 1989 by a remote keyless entry system.

Nissan offered the same door keypad technology on the 1984 Maxima, Fairlady, Gloria and Cedric, essentially using the same approach as Ford, with the addition of being able to roll the windows down and open the optional moonroof from outside the vehicle on the door handle installed keypad on both the driver's and front passengers door as well as roll the windows up, close the optional sunroof and lock the vehicle.

As of 2024, Ford continued to offer a fob-operated remote keyless system or completely keyless system, augmented by its Securicode five-button keypad.[5] The combination enabled tiered or time-restricted permissions, i.e., the code giving access to the vehicle but not its operation — and the code being easily changed to prevent subsequent vehicle access.

Function

[edit]

Keyless remotes contain a short-range radio transmitter, and must be within a certain range, usually 5–20 meters, of the car to work. When a button is pushed, it sends a coded signal by radio waves to a receiver unit in the car, which locks or unlocks the door. Most RKEs operate at a frequency of 315 MHz for North America-made cars and at 433.92 MHz for European, Japanese and Asian cars. Modern systems since the mid-1990s implement encryption as well as rotating entry codes to prevent car thieves from intercepting and spoofing the signal.[6] Earlier systems used infrared instead of radio signals to unlock the vehicle, such as systems found on Mercedes-Benz,[7] BMW[8] and other manufacturers.

The system signals that it has either locked or unlocked the car usually through some fairly discreet combination of flashing vehicle lamps, a distinctive sound other than the horn, or some usage of the horn itself. A typical setup on cars is to have the horn or other sound chirp twice to signify that the car has been unlocked, and chirp once to indicate the car has been locked. For example, Toyota, Scion, and Lexus use a chirp system to signify the car being locked/unlocked. While two beeps means that driver's door is unlocked, four beeps means all doors are unlocked. One long beep is for the trunk or power tailgate. One short beep signifies that the car is locked and alarm is set.

The functions of a remote keyless entry system are contained on a key fob or built into the ignition key handle itself. Buttons are dedicated to locking or unlocking the doors and opening the trunk or tailgate. On some minivans, the power sliding doors can be opened/closed remotely. Some cars will also close any open windows and roof when remotely locking the car. Some remote keyless fobs also feature a red panic button which activates the car alarm as a standard feature. Further adding to the convenience, some cars' engines with remote keyless ignition systems can be started by the push of a button on the key fob (useful in cold weather), and convertible tops can be raised and lowered from outside the vehicle while it's parked.

On cars where the trunk release is electronically operated, it can be triggered to open by a button on the remote. Conventionally, the trunk springs open with the help of hydraulic struts or torsion springs, and thereafter must be lowered manually. Premium models, such as SUVs and estates with tailgates, may have a motorized assist that can both open and close the tailgate for easy access and remote operation.

For offices, or residences, the system can also be coupled with the security system, garage door opener or remotely activated lighting devices.

Programming

[edit]

Remote keyless entry fobs emit a radio frequency with a designated, distinct digital identity code. Inasmuch as "programming" fobs is a proprietary technical process, it is typically performed by the automobile manufacturer. In general, the procedure is to put the car computer in 'programming mode'. This usually entails engaging the power in the car several times while holding a button or lever. It may also include opening doors, or removing fuses. The procedure varies amongst various makes, models, and years. Once in 'programming mode' one or more of the fob buttons is depressed to send the digital identity code to the car's onboard computer. The computer saves the code and the car is then taken out of programming mode.

As RKS fobs have become more prevalent in the automobile industry a secondary market of unprogrammed devices has sprung up. Some websites sell steps to program fobs for individual models of cars as well as accessory kits to remotely activate other car devices.

On early (1998–2012) keyless entry remotes, the remotes can be individually programmed by the user, by pressing a button on the remote, and starting the vehicle. However, newer (2013+) keyless entry remotes require dealership or locksmith programming via a computer with special software . The Infrared keyless entry systems offered user programming, though radio frequency keyless entry systems mostly require dealer programming.

Passive systems

[edit]

Some cars feature a passive keyless entry system. Their primary distinction is the ability to lock/unlock (and later iterations allow starting) the vehicle without any input from the user.

General Motors pioneered this technology with the Passive Keyless Entry (PKE) system in the 1993 Chevrolet Corvette. It featured passive locking/unlocking, but traditional keyed starting of the vehicle.

Today, passive systems are commonly found on a variety of vehicles, and although the exact method of operation differs between makes and models, their operation is generally similar: a vehicle can be unlocked without the driver needing to physically push a button on the key fob to lock or unlock the car. Additionally, some are able to start or stop the vehicle without physically having to insert a key.

Security

[edit]

Keyless ignition does not by default provide better security. In October 2014, it was found that some insurers in the United Kingdom would not insure certain vehicles with keyless ignition unless there were additional mechanical locks in place due to weaknesses in the keyless system.[9]

A security concern with any remote entry system is a spoofing technique called a replay attack, in which a thief records the signal sent by the key fob using a specialized receiver called a code grabber, and later replays it to open the door. To prevent this, the key fob does not use the same unlock code each time but a rolling code system; it contains a pseudorandom number generator which transmits a different code each use.[10] The car's receiver has another pseudorandom number generator synchronized to the fob to recognise the code. To prevent a thief from simulating the pseudorandom number generator the fob encrypts the code.

News media have reported cases where it is suspected that criminals managed to open cars by using radio repeaters to trick vehicles into thinking that their keyless entry fobs were close by even when they were far away (relay attack),[11] though they have not reported that any such devices have been found. The articles speculate that keeping fobs in aluminum foil or a freezer when not in use can prevent criminals from exploiting this vulnerability.[12]

In 2015, it was reported that Samy Kamkar had built an inexpensive electronic device about the size of a wallet that could be concealed on or near a locked vehicle to capture a single keyless entry code to be used at a later time to unlock the vehicle. The device transmits a jamming signal to block the vehicle's reception of rolling code signals from the owner's fob, while recording these signals from both of his two attempts needed to unlock the vehicle. The recorded first code is sent to the vehicle only when the owner makes the second attempt, while the recorded second code is retained for future use. Kamkar stated that this vulnerability had been widely known for years to be present in many vehicle types but was previously undemonstrated.[13] A demonstration was done during DEF CON 23.[14]

Actual thefts targeting luxury cars based on the above exploit have been reported when the key fob is near the front of the home. Several workaround can prevent such exploits, including placing the key fob in a tin box.[15][16] A criminal ring stole about 100 vehicles using this technique in Southern and Eastern Ontario.[17]

See also

[edit]
  • Near field communication
  • Ignition switch
  • Transponder car key

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Job, Ann. "Driving Without Car Keys". MSN Autos. Archived from the original on 9 May 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  2. ^ Mills, James (8 November 2014). "Keyless wonder: how did we end up with 'smart' wireless keys for our cars?". Sunday Times.
  3. ^ Torchinsky, Jason (23 February 2021). "I Had No Idea The Renault Fuego Was The Car With This Huge Automotive First". Jalopnik.
  4. ^ "1980–1985 RENAULT Fuego Turbo". Octane. Archived from the original on 27 October 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  5. ^ Ryan McManus (2 December 2004). "The Persistence of SecuriCode:". Medium.com.
  6. ^ Lake, Matt (7 June 2001). "HOW IT WORKS; Remote Keyless Entry: Staying a Step Ahead of Car Thieves". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 10 February 2017.
  7. ^ infrared-keyless-entry, benzworld.org.
  8. ^ "Archived copy of post to BMW forum". Archived from the original on 9 November 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  9. ^ "Thieves target luxury Range Rovers with keyless locking systems". TheGuardian.com. 27 October 2014.
  10. ^ Brain, Marshall (15 August 2001). "How remote entry works". How Stuff Works website. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
  11. ^ "CCTV video shows suspects using electronic method to steal cars in northeast Toronto – CityNews Toronto".
  12. ^ Steinberg, Joseph (12 May 2015). "Vulnerability In Car Keyless Entry Systems Allows Anyone To Open And Steal Your Vehicle". Forbes.
  13. ^ Thompson, Cadie (6 August 2015). "A hacker made a $30 gadget that can unlock many cars that have keyless entry". Tech Insider. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
  14. ^ Kamkar, Samy (7 August 2015). "Drive It Like You Hacked It: New Attacks and Tools to Wirelessly Steal Cars". DEF CON 23. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
  15. ^ "3 solutions to electronic car theft, a continuing threat to high-end Toronto automobiles". CBC.
  16. ^ "Toyota, Lexus owners warned about thefts that use 'relay attacks'". CBC.
  17. ^ "20 charged in high-end vehicle thefts in Ontario". CBC.
[edit]
  • Article about how keyless entry remote systems on automobiles work
  • Requirements of Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) Systems
  • False warning about RKE code thieves at Snopes.com

 

Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Will County


Driving Directions From Joliet to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Joliet West High School to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Dollar General to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From MainStay Suites Joliet I-80 to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Honorable Thomas A Dunn to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Honorable Robert P Livas to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Pilcher Park Nature Center to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Knoch Knolls Nature Center to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lake Katherine Nature Center and Botanic Gardens to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From DuPage Children's Museum to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Waterfall Glen Forest Preserve to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lockport Prairie Nature Preserve to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Riverwalk Park to Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Reviews for Overhead Door Company of Joliet


Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Jim Chuporak

(5)

Received a notice the morning of telling me when to expect the men to come and put the door in. he was on time, answered all my questions, worked diligently in the cold. And did an absolutely awesome job. Everything was cleaned up, hauled away from the old door. I am extremely happy with the service I received from the first phone call I made through having the door put in. My wife and I are very, very happy with the door.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Kelley Jansa

(5)

We used Middleton Door to upgrade our garage door. We had three different companies come out to quote the job and across the board Middleton was better. They were professional, had plenty of different options and priced appropriately. The door we ordered came with a small dent and they handled getting a new panel ordered and reinstalled very quickly.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Owen McCarthy

(5)

I called the office just by chance to see if there was an available opening for a service call to repair a busted spring. Unfortunately I didn’t catch the name of the person who answere, but she couldn’t have been more pleasant and polite. She was able to get a tech to my house in an hour. I believe the tech’s name was Mike and he too was amazing. He quickly resolved my issue and even corrected a couple of things that he saw that weren’t quite right. I would recommend to anyone and will definitely call on Middleton for any future needs. Thank you all for your great service.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Andrea Nitsche

(4)

Scheduling was easy, job was done quickly. Little disappointed that they gave me a quote over email (which they confirmed was for labor and materials), but when they finished it was just over $30 more. Not a huge deal, but when I asked why, I was told they gave me an approx cost and it depends on what is needed. I get that in general, however, they installed the door and I gave them my address and pics of the existing prior to getting a quote. I feel like they could have been more upfront with pricing. And just a heads up, it was pricey... Had them change the weather stripping, from ringing my doorbell to pulling out my driveway when done was literally 20 mins, cost was just over $260 😬

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Hector Melero

(5)

Had a really great experience with Middleton Overhead Doors. My door started to bow and after several attempts on me fixing it I just couldn’t get it. I didn’t want to pay on something I knew I could fix. Well, I gave up and they came out and made it look easy. I know what they are doing not to mention they called me before hand to confirm my appointment and they showed up at there scheduled appointment. I highly recommend Middleton Overhead Doors on any work that needs to be done

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

Key factors include the weight and size of the garage door, the type of door (e.g., sectional or one-piece), frequency of use, and any additional features such as insulation or windows that may add weight.
Heavier doors require more powerful motors to operate efficiently. Its essential to know your doors weight to choose a motor with adequate horsepower to ensure smooth operation without strain.
Yes, frequent use demands a more robust and durable motor. For high-traffic garages, opt for models designed for heavy-duty cycles to prevent wear and maintain performance over time.
Generally, 1/3 HP is suitable for single-car lightweight doors; 1/2 HP fits standard double-car doors; while 3/4 HP or higher is ideal for heavier insulated or wooden doors. Always refer to manufacturer guidelines for specific recommendations.